Dominic Luscombe

Three reasons for focusing on the individual behind the DTOC statistics

May 15, 2018

In recent years hospital trusts, CCGs and local councils have focused increasing attention and resources on reducing Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOC). This annual cost of this issue for the NHS and the impact on demand for adult social care – as well as the human cost of delays – has been well documented. For this reason it has been a natural area for collaboration between health and social care, with commendable results in many parts of the country. However, our work with frontline teams across the interface of health and social care suggests that a narrow focus on this issue is unhelpful. We need to turn our attention to individuals rather than numbers, for three key reasons:

1.      Many of those stuck in hospital should not have been admitted in the first place: Our case reviews with one client indicate that 47% of those requiring support on discharge could have avoided admission to hospital in the first place (had they received the right intervention at the point of admission to hospital, or been provided with the right support in the community prior to this). Admissions avoidance is where the focus of health and social care partnership working is most needed.

2.      System focus needs to be on individuals’ long-term independence and outcomes: Recent case reviews also indicate that, following a stay in hospital, almost one in five older people with the potential for reablement at home ended up with care home placements or costly care packages. While discussions about DTOC inevitably centre on the number of days individuals are stuck in hospital, the much bigger question is whether we have achieved the right outcomes for those individuals and the impact on the public purse.

3.      A focus on DTOC misses the ‘bigger picture’: For a cohort of patients, a DTOC episode could relate to one of many discharges, following one of many admissions. What long term benefit is achieved from reducing a delay on discharge if the patient is readmitted to hospital a couple of months later, or discharged into support that does not allow them to live as independently as possible? We need to better understand the people at the centre of this issue, and the full picture of their interaction with the health and care system.

In order to deliver and sustain improved outcomes, our view is that the focus needs to be on the wider outcomes and journeys of individuals and cohorts, rather than delays or transactions within one part of the system. To do that, we need to work across organisational boundaries. We also need to adopt a philosophy and approach which prioritises long-term independence across the health and care system.

Sign up for our iMPOWER iNSIGHTS newsletter

No spam; unsubscribe easily at any time

iMPOWER is a values led consultancy dedicated to the reform of the public sector. See what we've helped to achieve.

See Our Work

Sign up for our iMPOWER iNSIGHTS newsletter

Contributors
  • Jeremy Cooper
  • James Edmondson
  • Martin Cresswell
  • Sarah Atkinson
  • Olly Swann
  • Ebony Hughes
  • Amanda Kelly
  • Alastair Thompson
  • Amy Crowson
  • Ben Evans
  • Branwen Harris
  • Campbell Walker
  • Caroline Lloyd
  • Clare Askew
  • Clare Harding
  • David Colbear
  • Debbie Owen
  • Deborah Crossan
  • Dominic Luscombe
  • Dr Ed Fitzgerald
  • Edward Wallace
  • Emma Ockelford
  • Grace Warman
  • Harrie Palmer
  • Helen Bailey
  • Helena Ball
  • Henrietta Curzon
  • Jason Walton
  • Jenna Collins
  • Jenny McArdle
  • iMPOWER
  • Jon Ainger
  • Kieran Brett
  • Laura Bushell
  • Leo Jones
  • Lia Chelminiak
  • Liam Booth-Smith
  • Maggie Atkinson
  • Mark Methven
  • Matan Czaczkes
  • Michael Whitmore
  • Nigel Guest
  • Olivia Page
  • Ralph Cook
  • Richard Hills
  • Samantha Griffin
  • Stuart Lindsay
  • Thomas Spencer
  • Vanessa Reeve
Latest Tweets